The disinformation of Obamacare

Obamacare was sold on a trinity of lies.
Most people are aware of the first deception in the triumvirate of deceit: “If you like your health insurance you can keep it, period.” The second deception was “If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor.” However the third plank in the triad of disinformation hasn’t gotten much attention: “Obamacare will save you, me, and the country a lot of money.” Well, this lie took several forms, I’ll give you that.

The disinformation of Obamacare

First, Obama promised on many occasions that the average family of four will save $2,500 a year in premiums. Where did that number come from though? Three Harvard economists wrote a memo in 2007 in which they claimed that then-Senator Obama’s health-care plan would reduce national health-care spending by $200 billion.

The president and his allies insisted that all of Obamacare’s “free” preventative care would actually save the country vast amounts of money. As Obama put it in 2012: “As part of the health-care reform law that I signed last year, all insurance plans are required to cover preventive care at no cost. That means free check-ups, free mammograms, immunizations, and other basic services. We fought for this because it saves lives and it saves money — for families, for businesses, for government, for everybody.”
Again, this isn’t true either. First of all, you’d think people would understand that there is no such thing as “at no cost.” You are paying for “free” mammograms, blood tests, and the rest, even if you don’t see a line item for them on your bill. And even if you’re poor enough that you don’t even see a bill, that doesn’t mean no one’s paying. That’s why millions of Americans who’ve lost their health insurance thanks to Obamacare are discovering that the new plans it offers are either more expensive, have higher deductibles, or both.

And, prevention doesn’t necessarily save money. Just think about it.
According to the National Cancer Institute, 12.4 % of American women will get breast cancer at some point in their lives. So for every positive diagnosis there are seven negative diagnoses. Those tests cost a lot of money. Moreover, of the women who do get it, premature screenings won’t necessarily catch it. That in no way means that screenings don’t make sense. They do, particularly for women in high-risk groups. But testing everybody isn’t a great way to save money. As the Congressional Budget Office reported in August, “The evidence suggests that for most preventive services, expanded utilization leads to higher, not lower, medical spending overall.”

So, Obamacare may have been sold on a trinity of lies, but it turns out it’s also lies all the way down.

Feedback/Comments

Add a comment

Posting comment as guest.
If you already have an account, please LOGIN.
If not, you may consider creating on. It’s FREE!




Popular new stories

12/21/15
THE FOX GUARDING THE HEN COOP

1/18/16
Health is only what’s easy to measure: the case for mental health tracking

Categories

Editors List

Cash Doctor (Administrator)

Cooper B (Cooper)

George B (George)

Grace B (Grace)

Rob Stehlin (rob_stehlin)

Tags

8 word solution to healthcare access to health care access to information affordable health care afghanistan war ai-enabled healthcare annual cost of medical errors in usa apple healthkit bad healthcare barack obama big data cash doctor app cashdoctor app cashdoctor community cashdoctor mission cashdoctor.com platform cash-only patients college students are hurting consumer empowerment cost increases cost of health care cost reduction cost transparency crowdsourcing healthcare information data mining destroyed lives direct pay physicians direct pay practice direct pay system disruptive technologies dr. oliva blog post florida hospital association future healthcare google knowledge graph health health apps health care health care debate health care deception health care hidden agendas health care reform health insurance health insurance is a right health law health measures health plan healthcare healthcare changes healthcare decision making healthcare factors healthcare impact healthcare insurance healthcare lies healthcare movement healthcare price transparency healthcare reform healthcare solution healthcare system healthcare transparency health-related queries higher deductibles hospital cash discount hurt women hurt young people insurance insurance scam internet self-diagnosis large price increases lost jobs measuring value medical data privacy medical debt medical records privacy medical services price sharing medicare payments mobile apps mobile health search mobile healthcare mobile medicine obama obama administration obama’s health care lies obama’s manipulation obamacare obamacare and babies obamacare and pregnant women obamacare deception obamacare disinformation obamacare lies opposed to obamacare patient empowerment physician extenders ppo prefered provider organizations pregnant women and healthcare president obama prevention price comparison data price transparency privacy breach public agenda national survey public expectations on price information searching for healthcare costs share cost sharing information about medical costs social media impact on healthcare standardization of medical procedures symptom search telemedicine transparency transparent free market solution u.s. health system unmet needs us healthcare 2015 predictions usa today analysis user-friendly healthcare it value-based healthcare value-based points what women think of obamacare white house lies women women hate obamacare world hospital database